Opinion | The battle in the Trump Court

A situation in the first week of the Second Trump administration: after the president the White movement announced a shared funding, starting from 500 billion dollars, in the Open, Oracle and Softbank to build a new center for new intelligence The future, Elon Musk lamented with X that the money for the effort was not there.

Asked if Ally’s billions bothered him, the president shrugged it off: “No, it’s not. He hates one of the people in the deal.” This indicated a conflict with the musk with Sam Altman, the CEO of OpenMenai. And President Trump added, “I also hate people.”

It’s an enlightening moment, not just an exciting line. Every new administration has a party that ends up in a relationship even on the same official team. But the second white man’s house begins in a unique field of open conflict between different people, different countries and the world.

This is not, however, a sign of Trump’s weakness. At first, many people around him tried to remove the semblance of Washingtonian normalcy from the president’s ineptitude. The second time is different: Trump has established himself as a court with a special judicial loyalty, and there is an incentive for everyone who wants something in America (no illegal immigration). meaningful or the DEI no longer Program) appear before him as an activist, endangering his dignity in the hope of benefiting from the throne.

In the near term, at least until the Democratic Party rises to the mat, it means the biggest contradiction in American politics is happening in Trump’s court. I’ve written about one visible area of ​​potential conflict – the great tension between Populism and Silicon Valley Libertarianism. But now there are a few more internal battles to look at.

Defense of Wall Street: It should be noted that Trump’s first kill is that the executive action did not include the large tariffs that he promised to make competitors and neighbors. His desire to protect himself is clear, but the Court is full of elites whispering warnings about not going too far, instead of disrupting the stock market, finding a more modest way to play William Mckinley.

A recent comment by JPMorgan Chase CEO Jamie Dimon is a useful example of this tweet. Dimon appeared to turn Trumpist, justifying the tariffs on the side of national security, urging critics to “get to it.” But if the national Ramesh Ponnuru pointed out that Dimon has really justified the effort far more than the freedom and security of the office that threatened Trump. It is a common legal action: Praise the wisdom of the king, if your way is easy for him.

Middle eastern hair ornament with realist and dove. Trump’s first term has produced a foreign policy that has mostly favored Iran and left little time between the United States and Israel. His recent actions did not disturb the part of the national park: the fire pressure he put in the government of Benjamin Netany, and a group of self-defense, and the removal of secrets and the removal of the secret service for Mike Pompeo, John Bolton and Brian Hokook, may all be Iranian targets for their role as a speedster in the first instance.

This latest move has drawn direct criticism of Trump. But in the case of the tariff war, where more advisers are accused of turning the President’s agenda or “coasting” into office (as Mark Levin complained to the appointment of Michael Dimino, no hawk, Secretary of Defense for Middle East Oil), with the suggestion that Trump would not approve.

Robert F. Kennedy Jr. VS. The future. Kennedy is a machine of contradictions – Pro-Choice in the pro-life party, a critic of agribusiness in a party that depends on the state’s votes. But the most profound tension is between the vision of its sanctity, the anti-corporate and technological acceleration of the allies of Silicon Valley.

For example, after an open-air announcement that excited the snarky, Nicole Shananan, warned Megyn Kellan, that the use of AI has developed a new special vaccine, the scenario of Larry Ellison in the announcement, “can lead to extinction.”

This is a good way of dealing with potential conflicts between rulers. And the strange thing is that there are people out there, people who work in AI now, who share a version of Shanahane. They don’t think MRNA technology will kill everyone. Even if they suspect or fear or hope that AI will introduce a paradigm in humans, fast.

This means that the news that is the most suitable, the best economic news for the Trump Administration – the development of AI – could also make the court the place of the argument, the culture war to end the war all, it leaves all other problems in its shadow.